b5media.com

Advertise with us

Enjoying this blog? Check out the rest of the Lifestyles Channel Subscribe to this Feed

Play Library

Product Recall: Reebok Heart-Shaped Charm Bracelets

by Hsien-Hsien Lei on March 24th, 2006

Just a few days after swallowing the heart off a free charm bracelet that came with a pair of Reebok shoes, 4-year-old Jarnell Brown was dead. The heart charm was pure lead and the level of lead in Jarnell’s blood was three times higher than what is considered dangerous.

Better safe than sorry. Get rid of any cheap trinkets and costume jewelry within children’s reach.

Reebok Heart-Shaped Charm Bracelets RECALLED

Hazard: The recalled jewelry contains high levels of lead, posing a risk of lead poisoning and adverse health effects to young children.

Description: The recall involves an 8-inch long metal bracelet with a heart-shaped charm. The name “Reebok” is engraved on the one side of the charm. The charm bracelet was provided as a free gift with the purchase of various styles of children’s footwear.

Remedy: Consumers should immediately take the charm bracelets away from children and dispose of the entire bracelet.

For more information, see the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission.

West Central Tribune, March 24, 2006

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

POSTED IN: Product Recalls

4 opinions for Product Recall: Reebok Heart-Shaped Charm Bracelets

  • Deb
    Mar 25, 2006 at 10:09 am

    :O Those poor parents! OMG!

    Who would have thought something distributed with Reebok would be a problem? This sort of news is scary stuff to hear as a parent. :/

  • Lei
    Mar 25, 2006 at 11:00 am

    Deb: I agree! This was not one of those run-of-the-mill product recalls.

  • Christina
    Mar 28, 2006 at 5:26 am

    That is frightening! What on earth was Reebok thinking???

  • Lei
    Mar 28, 2006 at 5:32 am

    Christina: They probably didn’t think people would be handing the bracelets to their kids to play with. Most of these cheap, junkie jewelry is made in China where quality assurance is very low priority.

Have an opinion? Leave a comment: